Example Reports

See what a FiClaw backtest report looks like

Each example keeps the original prompt, strategy summary, key metrics, diagnosis and next steps, so you can see how FiClaw organizes strategy generation, real backtesting and iteration.

Momentum Rotation Backtest Example

How FiClaw turns a 20-day momentum rotation idea into a strategy spec, generates code, submits a backtest and returns a diagnosis based on the metrics.

Sample prompt

A monthly momentum rotation on a 20-day factor, holding the 20 strongest names in the CSI 300 equal-weight and rebalancing monthly.

Read the report ->

Parameter Optimization Report Example

How FiClaw extracts tunable parameters from a strategy, runs a grid search and judges parameter sets by return, drawdown, Sharpe and neighborhood stability.

Sample prompt

Optimize a momentum rotation strategy: search the momentum window, holding count and rebalance frequency to raise Sharpe while containing max drawdown.

Read the report ->

Multi-Factor Stock Selection Backtest Example

How FiClaw turns quality, momentum and low-volatility factors into selection rules, A-share backtests, exposure diagnosis and risk metrics.

Sample prompt

Build a quality, momentum and low-volatility three-factor selection strategy on the CSI 300, rebalanced monthly, with a single-sector weight cap of 30%, and output a 10-year-plus historical backtest report.

Read the report ->

Mean Reversion Risk Diagnosis Example

How FiClaw assesses a mean-reversion strategy's win rate, profit-loss ratio, max drawdown and tail risk, avoiding a high-win-rate-only conclusion.

Sample prompt

Design a mean-reversion strategy on a 20-day moving average with a 2-standard-deviation deviation, add a 10-day max holding period and a stop-loss, and output a risk diagnosis report.

Read the report ->

Transaction Cost Sensitivity Report Example

How FiClaw compares strategy performance under different fee, slippage and turnover assumptions to judge whether backtest return survives real trading costs.

Sample prompt

Run a transaction-cost sensitivity analysis on a momentum rotation strategy, comparing annual return, Sharpe, max drawdown and turnover under 0, 5, 10 and 20 bps cost assumptions.

Read the report ->